Cybersecurity (VAPT)
Identify and validate exploitable weaknesses across web applications, APIs, networks and source code before attackers do.
Overview
Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing that finds and safely validates exploitable weaknesses, then delivers evidence-based findings, remediation guidance and retesting.
- MethodologyPTES and NIST SP 800-115, with scope and testing windows agreed first.
- DiscoveryAttack-surface discovery across applications, APIs, networks and infrastructure.
- ValidationControlled testing with tools such as Burp Suite, Nmap and Metasploit.
- ReportingCVSS-rated findings with evidence, then retesting after remediation.
Technical scope
- Web Application Security. Authentication, authorization, session management, input validation, business logic and common OWASP-aligned weaknesses
- API Security. API discovery, authentication and authorization testing, input validation, rate-limit review and abuse-case analysis
- Network VAPT. External and internal assessment, exposed services, segmentation review, configuration weaknesses and controlled validation
- Infrastructure Security. Server, firewall, exposed management interfaces and security configuration review
- Configuration and Hardening. Baseline comparison, insecure configuration identification and practical hardening recommendations
- Reporting and Retesting. Evidence-based findings with severity, affected assets, remediation guidance and optional verification after fixes
How an engagement works
Every engagement follows a controlled lifecycle. We agree scope, assets, credentials and testing windows first, discover the attack surface, validate vulnerabilities with controlled testing, rate the risk with technical evidence, and finish with remediation guidance and retesting of resolved findings.
Our testing lifecycle
- 01
Scope
Define scope, assets, credentials and testing windows
- 02
Discover
Discover attack surface and enumerate services
- 03
Validate
Validate vulnerabilities using controlled testing
- 04
Rate
Rate risk and document technical evidence
- 05
Remediate
Deliver remediation guidance and retest resolved findings
Tools and deliverables
Reports list each finding with affected asset, reproduction steps, CVSS severity, business impact and remediation guidance. Retesting confirms closure, and scope, methodology and testing windows are recorded so results can be repeated or audited.
Deliverables
- Executive summary
- Technical findings with evidence and reproduction steps
- CVSS-rated risk register
- Remediation guidance
- Retest report
- Attestation letter on request
Common questions
Which methodology and standards guide the testing?
Engagements follow PTES and NIST SP 800-115, with application testing aligned to OWASP Top 10 and ASVS. Findings are scored with CVSS so that severity is consistent and comparable between assets and between tests, and the methodology, scope and testing windows are written down so the work can be repeated or audited.
How do you validate vulnerabilities without causing damage?
Scope, assets, credentials and testing windows are agreed first. Exploitation is controlled and non-destructive, used only to prove that a weakness is real and to show its impact, and evidence is captured for each finding, so you can see exactly what was done without risking availability or data integrity.
What does a finding in the report contain?
Each finding lists the affected asset, evidence and reproduction steps, CVSS severity, business impact and specific remediation guidance. This gives engineers enough detail to reproduce the issue, apply the fix and verify it, while management gets a clear view of risk ranked by severity and by the assets affected.
Can you retest after we fix the issues?
Yes. Retesting confirms that remediated findings are actually closed and that the fixes have not introduced new weaknesses in the same area. Results are added to the report as a verification record, so you have evidence of closure to share with auditors, customers or the board rather than relying on a ticket status.